I had a very interesting experience after seeing the film version of John Patrick Shanley’s Pulitzer Prize winning play, Doubt, which was adapted for screen and directed by Shanley. Doubt tells the story of an older nun, played by Meryl Streep, who is convinced that the progressive priest (Phillip Seymore Hoffman) is guilty of molesting the only black child in the Catholic school where they work. My husband and I both felt that the film was much less ambiguous than the play and made us clearly believe that the priest was guilty. Then I checked with two friends who had seen the film, and they both agreed that the film was less ambiguous than the play, but they believed it showed that the priest was not guilty. So I guess that Shanley accomplished what he set out to accomplish, which was to explore the concept of doubt on many levels. The film is beautifully acted by Streep and Hoffman, with outstanding supporting performances by Amy Adams, luminous as the younger, more innocent nun, and Viola Davis as the boy’s mother. I had seen the play twice and still found the movie riveting.
3 responses so far ↓
Barbara // January 1, 2009 at 10:11 pm
I don’t usually comment on my own posts BUT…after seeing Doubt, I had a very strong urge to listen to Les Miserables, which I hadn’t listened to in years. So today, I took a walk and listened to the first disc on my I-pod. I had this realization that Sister Aloysius (Meryl Streep) in Doubt was like Javert in in Les Miserables, having complete certainty about belief in a system or a code of behavior, and acting only according to that, without flexibility or humanity. I thought that maybe our soon to be ex-President has been acting in the same sort of way, and I am so looking forward to January 20 and our new President. Happy New Year to all.
Coach Isa // January 11, 2009 at 8:08 pm
I went to see Doubt a couple of days ago and I feel “it is still within me” . I loved the movie, the acting and the plot. Extraordinary work of a detailed description of a “pathological “Reformer” in Sister Aloysius (Meryl Streep). From my point of you , I am convinced of the priest’s innocence: It is showed through the intolerant, self-righteous and bitter attitude of Sister Aloysius. Her inflexibility and harsh behavior and her need to be right go above anything else. She is not able to connect with her own humanity and so is unable to connect with the Priest’s genuine love for his students. It is such a smart movie! I was amazed of how the movie plays with the audience, putting us in a doubt(of course) and even pushing the envelope: the leaving of the Priest could be interpreted as his confession ( Sister Aloysius own projection) however I saw this decision as the profound and genuine love he has for his community.
I could go again watch this superb movie.
I have to say that I was a bit disappointed by the way it ends: Sister Aloysius’s break down in doubt is not believable at this point. She is way too close-minded to be able to even doubt for a second….
Barbara, I am glad you are back in your critics! You are always a great inspiration to go to the movies. Here in San Juan the movies usually come a bit latter than in mother land and I am waiting for “Revolutionary Road ” to show!
Happy New Year to you and your husband.
Isa
Barbara // January 11, 2009 at 9:17 pm
Thank you, Isa, for the great comment. I think that the genius of “Doubt” is that it stirs us in so many ways and brings out many differing reactions. I agree that there was something not believable about Sister Aloysius crying out that she had so much doubt at the end–I just did not believe her.